12 Feb 2021

Pushbacks and lack of accountability at the Greek-Turkish borders

Roberto Cortinovis

26
Download Publication

26329 Downloads

Amid escalating geopolitical tension with Turkey, in March 2020 the Greek authorities announced a hardline approach towards asylum seekers attempting to cross its land and sea borders with Turkey. The framing of cross-border movements as a ‘threat’ to the country’s national security served to justify a derogation from the human rights standards and procedural guarantees that are granted to people seeking protection under EU law. Since then, a pattern of systematic pushbacks at the border and informal returns represents the most visible expression of this hardening of border policies at the EU’s south-eastern borders.

This paper analyses the negative impact of this heavily securitised approach on asylum seekers’ fundamental rights, in particular its implications for the right to asylum that underpins the Common European Asylum System (CEAS).

The paper also reflects on the limits and ambiguities that have characterised the EU’s response to the situation at the Greek-Turkish borders, focusing on the role and responsibilities of the Frontex Agency. It underlines the need for the EU to remedy the shortcomings in existing accountability mechanisms, to guarantee effective remedies for victims of fundamental rights violations at the border. Establishing a sustainable human- rights-compliant management of migration in the eastern Mediterranean also requires that the EU move away from its focus on containing and restricting asylum seekers’ mobility – a focus that has characterised cooperation on migration and asylum with Turkey within the framework of the 2016 EU-Turkey Statement.

The ASILE project studies the interactions between emerging international protection systems and the United Nations Global Compact for Refugees (UN GCR), with particular focus on the European Union’s role. Adopting an interdisciplinary perspective, it examines the characteristics of international and country-specific asylum governance instruments and arrangements, and their compatibility with international and regional human rights and refugee laws.

The ASILE project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement nº 870787. This document reflects only the author’s view and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

Discourses about irregularised migrants at the EU level

Representation and narratives in the European Commission, the European Parliament and civil society

A cold, hard look in the mirror

Issues and priorities for the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice in the wake of Trump 2.0

Irregularising Human Mobility

EU Migration Policies and the European Commission’s Role

Global Asylum Governance and the European Union’s Role

Rights and Responsibility in the Implementation of the United Nations Global Compact on Refugees

A rule of law agenda for 2030

Priorities for a principled area of freedom, security and justice

Irregularised migration and the next European Commission

Ensuring enforcement and intersectional monitoring of the rule of law and fundamental rights

Reconstitutionalising privacy

EU-US data transfers and their impact on the rule of law, rights and trust